If the claim is true, then thoughts, emotions, memory, identity, imagination, mystical experience, and the sense of being a self are all ultimately products of physical processes.

If the claim is false, then materialism may be missing something fundamental about reality.

The defender must explain how consciousness can arise from matter.

The destroyer must explain why this relationship does not necessarily imply production.

Defend or destroy the claim.

The claim is that moral truths do not exist independently of human minds, cultures, biology, history, or preference.

If the claim is true, then morality is something humans create, negotiate, inherit, and enforce.

If the claim is false, then some things are truly right or wrong, even if every society approves of the opposite.

The defender must explain why morality does not need objective truth.

The destroyer must explain where objective moral truth comes from, and how we could know it.

Defend or destroy the claim.

If the claim is true, then every decision, regret, achievement, crime, act of love, and act of cruelty came from prior causes extending beyond the person.

If the claim is false, then there must be some form of agency that cannot be reduced entirely to biology, environment, conditioning, and causality.

The defender must explain why choice only feels free.

The destroyer must explain where real agency enters the chain of cause and effect.

Defend or destroy the claim.